shawndoggy wrote:
I think the "new" A22 (16 and up) probably surfs a little better. Weaker regular wave is a consistent malibu feature on the older hulls. That wave actually looks pretty good for what you have to work with.
Personally, I'd drop some weight in the rear till the bow comes down. All that rear weight is putting the propshaft at teh wrong angle and a more aggressive prop won't change much other than spinning higher RPMs and burning more fuel. With the underseat sack already full and 3 peeps in the bow, I'd be a little cautious on the lead placement at first. You could definitely turn your boat into a big water scoop if you aren't careful. Might try stacking the lead in the walkway and then moving it forward as you get comfortable.
Im not letting more ballast out to bring down the nose. I have tried that though, and the wake is 1/2 the size 2ft longer with no push what so ever. I'm not going to settle for a longboard use wake. I have the lead to move the people out of the nose and put them in the back adding more weight in the boat all-around. I have seen/read forums of people putting in 900s, and 1100s in their lockers and their wake looks lippy, and steep with the same boat/engine as mine (but with an aggressive prop). Why are more aggressive props designed then? To pull more weight and plane out the boat, right? I have seen 350s A20s with a steeper/lippier and just as long of a wake than mine...
I dont know if a more aggressive prop will burn more fuel. Best way i can describe it as my boat right now is busting a nut to plane out aka its working hard but its never fully planed. According to wakemakers if im over 3k pounds of additional weight i need a more aggressive prop. If i put an aggressive prop in there to make it easier to push the boat wont that cause me to use less gas or even the same amount? I dont know, Ill have to test my theory out... Right now im sitting at 3200RPMs surfing 11.2mph. We do 100% surfing right now but we may wakeboard sometime in the future again.